The best Greenhouse integrations in 2026 start with Pin for AI sourcing, which searches 850M+ candidate profiles and syncs approved matches into Greenhouse from $99/mo billed annually. For in-house teams that need candidates who never applied, Pin is the best sourcing integration for Greenhouse. The rest of a strong stack covers scheduling (GoodTime, Calendly), interview intelligence (BrightHire, now owned by Zoom), assessments (HackerRank, TestGorilla), background checks (Checkr), and HRIS sync (Rippling).
A Greenhouse connector is a partner app that syncs candidates, jobs, stages, or scorecards with the ATS through a native connector or the Harvest API. Choice isn’t the hard part: the Greenhouse marketplace listed 452 partners when we checked on October 19, 2026. Fit is the hard part, and 2026 added a twist: Greenhouse removed its Harvest v1 and v2 APIs on August 31, 2026 (Greenhouse developer docs), pushing every key-based connector onto OAuth and the new v3 API. Below, 12 picks are grouped by hiring stage, with costs and migration notes for each.
Why Do Greenhouse Integrations Matter More in 2026?
AI has flooded the top of the funnel. In October 2026, Greenhouse reported that 86% of US recruiters say at least half of the applications they receive are AI-written, and fewer than 7% of applicants ever get an interview (Greenhouse, 2026). Volume is up. Signal is down.
Fraud makes it worse. Gartner projects that 1 in 4 candidate profiles worldwide could be fake by 2028, and 6% of candidates in its survey admitted to interview fraud (HR Dive, 2025). Meanwhile, the manual work hasn’t gone anywhere. UK recruiters log about 17.7 hours of admin per vacancy, including 2.5 hours on scheduling alone, and 61% say manual tasks like data entry slow hiring down (Totaljobs, 2025).
So why not buy more AI? Disconnected tools rarely pay off. Gartner found 88% of HR leaders say their organizations haven’t realized significant business value from AI tools (Gartner, 2025). Greenhouse integrations earn their slot when they remove a handoff between a tool and the ATS. If it adds a tab, it’s just another login.
Bottom line:
- Start with sourcing. Pin is the best Greenhouse integration for outbound sourcing, pairing the largest multi-source candidate database with an 83% candidate acceptance rate, from $99/mo billed annually.
- Scheduling and interviews come next. GoodTime and Calendly handle booking, and BrightHire records and summarizes interviews inside Greenhouse.
- Watch for paid gates. TestGorilla’s ATS sync requires its Plus plan (from $520/mo), and Workday or ADP sync needs a paid Greenhouse HRIS Link add-on.
- Re-check old connectors. Greenhouse removed Harvest API v1 and v2 on August 31, 2026, so anything still using an API key needs an OAuth reconnect.
Based on Pin’s data, Greenhouse adoption is a team-size story. Among 600+ recruiting teams with a connected ATS on Pin, Greenhouse holds 5.2% overall, but its share climbs from 3.4% among solo recruiters to 12.2% among teams with six or more seats (Pin platform data, June 2026; see the full ATS usage breakdown). That fits how Greenhouse sells: structured hiring for in-house teams with panels, scorecards, and hiring managers to coordinate. Those teams rarely lack process. What they lack is outbound pipeline, because Greenhouse was built to organize applicants, not to find people who never applied. We’ve seen this from both sides. The Pin team built Interseller, the outreach tool Greenhouse acquired in 2021 and turned into its Sourcing Automation add-on. The Greenhouse customers who got the most value kept the ATS as the system of record and plugged a specialist tool into each stage. That’s the logic behind the order below.
Which Greenhouse Integrations Fill the Candidate Pipeline?
Two tools that integrate with Greenhouse solve the pipeline problem: Pin for outbound AI sourcing and LinkedIn Recruiter System Connect for teams already paying for LinkedIn seats. Outbound matters because sourced candidates are 5x more likely to be hired than inbound applicants (Pin first-party data), and Greenhouse’s job is tracking them, not finding them.
1. Pin - Best Overall Greenhouse Sourcing Integration
Pin is the best Greenhouse integration for in-house recruiters who need a steady outbound pipeline without adding headcount. Its database pulls more than 850 million profiles from professional networks, GitHub, Stack Overflow, patents, and academic publications, with thousands of data points per profile instead of the hundreds a single network shows. Recruiters describe the role in plain language, and the AI ranks matches the way a recruiter would. According to Pin’s 2026 user survey, 83% of recommended candidates are accepted into customers’ hiring pipelines.
Approved candidates push into Greenhouse with profile data and contact details attached, so hiring managers review sourced talent in the same place as inbound applicants.
No CSV exports. No re-keying.
From there, Pin’s AI sourcing carries straight into outreach. Sequences send email automatically and queue AI-drafted LinkedIn and SMS tasks for the recruiter, and those multi-channel sequences earn 5x better response rates than industry averages. Interview scheduling sits in the same workflow.
There’s some history here, too. Pin comes from the team behind Interseller, which Greenhouse bought to become its Sourcing Automation add-on, so the product is shaped by years of watching Greenhouse teams source. On G2, Pin holds a 4.8/5 rating, and its 2026 user survey found recruiters save 12 hours a week on sourcing and outreach combined.
As Miles Randle, Head of People & Talent at Flip CX, puts it: “As a small people and talent team, we don’t have a ton of time to spend hours sourcing and messaging. Pin has made it possible for us to focus on the people side of things!”
Pricing: Free plan (no credit card, no ATS sync). Solo is $99/mo billed annually, and Professional is $135 per user/mo billed annually. ATS integration is an add-on on Solo and Professional and included on Business.
2. LinkedIn Recruiter System Connect (RSC)
If your recruiters already hold LinkedIn Recruiter seats, RSC is the obvious add, though the license is the expensive part. RSC flags LinkedIn profiles that already exist in Greenhouse, shows full profiles inside the ATS, and exports candidates in one click (Greenhouse Support). The newer RSC+ goes further, continuously pulling candidate, job, and application data into Recruiter so stages stay in sync.
Requirements are strict. RSC+ needs a LinkedIn Recruiter admin, a Greenhouse Site Admin, and at least one active LinkedIn Hiring Assistant seat. It doesn’t work with Recruiter Lite, and it isn’t Safari-compatible (Greenhouse Support). The integration is available on Greenhouse’s Core, Plus, and Pro plans at no extra charge. LinkedIn doesn’t publish Recruiter Corporate pricing, but buyer estimates run around $10,800-$12,000 per seat per year. That math explains why 91% of Pin users reduced or eliminated LinkedIn Recruiter spend after switching (Pin 2026 user survey).
Which Greenhouse Integrations Handle Scheduling and Interviews?
Scheduling eats about 2.5 hours per vacancy (Totaljobs, 2025), and interview notes take another 3. Greenhouse has native scheduling links and self-schedule windows, so these four picks matter most for panel-heavy loops, recorded interviews, and video links that shouldn’t be pasted by hand.
3. GoodTime
Running five-person panels every week? GoodTime is built for that, though quote-only pricing makes it hard for small departments to budget. Its Greenhouse integration is bi-directional and runs on the V3 API through OAuth. It syncs candidates, jobs, applications, interviews, stages, interviewers, scorecards, offices, and users, while Greenhouse stays the system of record (Greenhouse Support). Setup needs a GoodTime Super Admin, a Greenhouse admin, and a service account for authorization. GoodTime doesn’t publish pricing, and it holds a 4.4/5 rating on G2 from about 116 reviews.
ModernLoop is the closest alternative, with a Greenhouse integration of its own and a 4.6/5 G2 rating from 72 reviews. Neither vendor lists prices.
4. Calendly
Calendly suits simple screens and one-on-one interviews, but it won’t orchestrate a five-person loop. Recruiters can schedule from inside Greenhouse with their own link or a teammate’s, and stage-transition rules can send scheduling requests automatically (Greenhouse Support). Calendly’s plans run from Free to Standard at $10 per seat/mo and Teams at $16 per seat/mo, billed annually, with Enterprise starting at $15,000/year for 50+ seats (Calendly, 2026). The pricing page doesn’t say which tier includes the ATS integration, so confirm with Calendly before you buy.
5. BrightHire
For companies standardizing structured interviews, BrightHire is the most mature option, though it overlaps more each quarter with Greenhouse’s own AI. BrightHire records and transcribes interviews, then syncs jobs, candidates, applications, interviews, kits, and scorecards with Greenhouse. It writes notes back to the activity feed and can draft scorecards for interviewers (Greenhouse Integrations). Zoom acquired BrightHire in a deal that closed in December 2025, and the product stays a standalone brand (Zoom, 2025). Pricing isn’t published. G2 rating: 4.7/5 from about 187 reviews.
Check for overlap before you sign: Greenhouse closed its acquisition of Ezra AI Labs, a voice AI interviewer, on May 27, 2026, and now ships native voice AI interviews (Greenhouse, 2026).
6. Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Slack
These three cover the basics and cost nothing beyond licenses you already own. The Greenhouse Zoom integration needs one org-wide approval from a Zoom admin, after which Zoom links attach to scheduled interviews automatically (Greenhouse Support). Microsoft Teams runs through Outlook 365, and each Teams link is unique to one event. The Greenhouse Slack integration sends @mention notifications to each user’s own channel. None of the three is exciting, but each removes a copy-paste step from every interview.
Which Assessment and Screening Tools Integrate with Greenhouse?
Screening is where fraud gets caught or missed, which makes it the stage where a Greenhouse AI screening integration earns its cost. In Greenhouse’s 2025 AI in Hiring Report, 65% of US hiring managers said they’ve caught applicants using AI deceptively, and 74% are more worried about fraud than a year earlier (Greenhouse, 2025). Greenhouse’s native Real Talent inbox now scores application quality and fraud likelihood. Assessment integrations add the skills proof on top.
7. HackerRank
Engineering orgs that want coding tests scored inside Greenhouse usually start here. Recruiters send tests from Greenhouse and scores flow back into the candidate record. After moving to Harvest v3, HackerRank asked customers to reconnect under Settings > Integrations > Greenhouse before August 28, 2026 (HackerRank, 2026). We couldn’t confirm current pricing on HackerRank’s site, and third-party listings conflict, so it’s marked unconfirmed in the table below. G2 rating: 4.6/5 from about 1,015 reviews.
Two alternatives deserve a look. CodeSignal (4.5/5, about 1,408 G2 reviews) fills a scorecard from its pre-screen results. Codility’s Advanced Screen adds plagiarism checks and suspicious-activity flags, but Codility dropped its legacy Interview integration when Harvest v1 retired.
8. TestGorilla
TestGorilla handles non-technical skills and personality tests, but the Greenhouse sync sits behind its top self-serve plan. Statuses and results sync to Greenhouse every 30 minutes (Greenhouse Support). TestGorilla offers a Free plan (10 credits/mo), Core from $215/mo, and Plus from $520/mo, all billed annually, and native ATS integrations are Plus-only (TestGorilla, 2026). G2 rating: 4.5/5 from about 1,414 reviews. Criteria Corp is a comparable option, though writing individual scores to Greenhouse custom fields is a paid upgrade.
9. Paradox
High-volume hourly hiring is where Paradox shines, though its auto-reject rules need careful human review. Its conversational AI screens applicants by chat, creates candidate profiles in Greenhouse, pushes status updates back, and can reject candidates on disqualifying answers (Greenhouse Support). Pricing is quote-only. G2 rating: 4.5/5 from about 83 reviews.
Candidate sentiment should shape the setup. Greenhouse’s 2026 candidate survey found 70% weren’t clearly told upfront that AI would evaluate them, and 38% abandoned a process because of an AI interview (Greenhouse, 2026). Disclose the AI step in the job post and the first message.
What Should Connect to Greenhouse After the Offer?
Post-offer integrations carry the most predictable costs. Checkr’s published background-check packages run from $29.99 to $94.99 per report (Checkr, 2026), and HRIS sync for Workday or ADP is a paid Greenhouse add-on. These three tools close the loop from signed offer to day one.
10. Checkr
US employers who want transparent, per-report background checks get exactly that, though court and database fees pass through at cost on top of the package price. Recruiters order checks from the candidate profile in Greenhouse and track status there (Greenhouse). Packages: Basic $29.99, Essential $59.99, and Complete $94.99 per report, with custom Enterprise pricing. G2 rating: 4.5/5 from about 456 reviews. HireRight and First Advantage (which now includes Sterling) also integrate, with First Advantage writing results into Greenhouse custom fields. For a wider comparison, see our background check tools guide.
11. Rippling (Plus the Workday and ADP Options)
Startups and mid-size companies running HR, IT, and payroll in one place get the most from Rippling, since its value depends on using it as the HRIS. Rippling’s Greenhouse app imports a hired candidate’s details and offer data in one click and can provision Greenhouse accounts during onboarding (Greenhouse Support). Enterprises usually need a different route. Hire Link for Workday exports new-hire data and documents, but it requires the paid HRIS Link for Workday add-on. HRIS Link for ADP Workforce Now is also a paid add-on, limited to US ADP customers. BambooHR connects through Greenhouse Onboarding, and HiBob receives hired candidates the moment they’re marked Hired. DocuSign rounds out the offer stage for e-signatures.
12. Zapier
Zapier fills small gaps Greenhouse doesn’t cover natively, but it isn’t built for high-volume data sync. It connects Greenhouse to thousands of apps with no code. Its Free plan includes 100 tasks a month and two-step Zaps, Professional starts at $19.99/mo, and Team starts at $69/mo, billed annually (Zapier, 2026). One warning: Zapier’s older Greenhouse 1.5.1 app stopped working on August 26, 2026, so Zaps built before then needed rebuilding (Zapier Help). G2 rating: 4.5/5 from about 2,083 reviews.
How Much Do Greenhouse Integrations Cost?
Five of the 12 entries publish prices we could verify as of October 19, 2026: Pin, Calendly, TestGorilla, Checkr, and Zapier. Zoom, Teams, and Slack ride on licenses you already have, and the rest are quote-only or unconfirmed. Greenhouse itself doesn’t publish pricing either, so budget for both sides; our breakdown of what Greenhouse costs per plan covers the ATS.
| Tool | Starting Price | Free Tier | Contract Minimum |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pin | $99/mo (Solo, billed annually) | ✅ Free forever plan | Annual billing on Solo |
| LinkedIn RSC | Integration free; Recruiter seat est. $10,800+/yr | ❌ | LinkedIn Recruiter contract |
| GoodTime | Quote-only | ❌ | Not published |
| Calendly | $10/seat/mo (Standard, annual) | ✅ | Annual for listed prices |
| BrightHire | Quote-only | ❌ | Not published |
| Zoom / Teams / Slack | Included with existing licenses | ✅ | Your existing contract |
| HackerRank | Not confirmed | Not confirmed | Not published |
| TestGorilla | $520/mo for ATS sync (Plus, annual) | ⚠️ Free plan, no ATS sync | Annual billing |
| Paradox | Quote-only | ❌ | Not published |
| Checkr | $29.99 per report | ❌ | Pay per report |
| Rippling | Not published | ❌ | Not published |
| Zapier | $19.99/mo (Professional, annual) | ✅ 100 tasks/mo | None on Free |
Did the Harvest API v3 Migration Break Your Greenhouse Integrations?
It may have. Greenhouse removed Harvest API v1 and v2 on August 31, 2026. Version 3 replaces static API keys with OAuth 2.0, switches to cursor-based pagination, and adds dedicated endpoints for moving, rejecting, and hiring candidates (Greenhouse Harvest v3 docs). Vendors set earlier deadlines: Zapier’s old app stopped on August 26 and HackerRank asked for reconnects by August 28.
Run this five-step audit if your stack predates September 2026:
- List every connector that used a Harvest API key. Anything still authenticating that way is either broken or about to be.
- Reconnect through OAuth with a service account. GoodTime and LinkedIn RSC both recommend a service account over a personal admin login, so integrations don’t break when someone leaves.
- Don’t run old and new versions side by side. HackerRank warns that running v1/v2 and v3 connections together creates duplicate updates.
- Check for duplicate candidates. Greenhouse auto-merge doesn’t evaluate prospects created through the Harvest or Ingestion APIs, or profiles created by third-party integrations, and merging overwrites the candidate ID that HRIS and API integrations depend on (Greenhouse Support). Subscribe to the candidate_merged webhook so connected tools hear about merges.
- Replace retired integrations. Codility’s legacy Interview integration is gone, for example, so teams using it need Advanced Screen and Advanced Interview instead.
Teams on other systems face the same audit on different timelines. Our guides to Ashby’s partner ecosystem and integrations for Bullhorn agencies cover those stacks, and if you’re still choosing an ATS, start by comparing Greenhouse against SmartRecruiters.
How We Picked These Greenhouse Integrations
We scored each tool on five criteria that matter to in-house TA departments running Greenhouse:
- Integration depth. One-way push or bi-directional sync, and which records move.
- Harvest v3 readiness. Whether the vendor documented an OAuth or v3 migration.
- Hiring-stage coverage. One clear job in the funnel, so the stack doesn’t overlap.
- Pricing transparency. Public pricing, a free tier, and any plan that gates the ATS sync.
- Reviewer sentiment. G2 rating and review volume.
On October 19, 2026, we reviewed the Greenhouse partner marketplace and the Greenhouse support article for every tool. We also read the Harvest v3 documentation and vendor migration notices, checked public pricing pages for Calendly, Checkr, TestGorilla, and Zapier, pulled G2 ratings and review counts, and captured each vendor’s homepage. Six entries don’t publish pricing we could verify, and we mark them in the table. Review counts differ slightly between a vendor’s G2 pages, so treat ratings as a snapshot from the date of the check.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many integrations does Greenhouse have?
Greenhouse’s marketplace listed 452 partner integrations on October 19, 2026, grouped into seven areas: HRIS and onboarding, job distribution, sourcing, screening, productivity, candidate experience, and analytics. Greenhouse’s own support docs describe it as “over 400” official partners. Teams can also build custom connections through the Harvest v3 API.
What is the best sourcing integration for Greenhouse?
Pin is the best sourcing integration for Greenhouse, with 850M+ candidate profiles, an 83% candidate acceptance rate, and paid plans from $99/mo billed annually. It syncs approved candidates into Greenhouse and runs multi-channel outreach from the same workflow. LinkedIn RSC is an option for teams already paying around $10,800+ per Recruiter seat each year.
Does Greenhouse integrate with Slack and Zoom?
Yes. The Greenhouse Slack integration sends @mention notifications to each user, and the Zoom integration attaches meeting links to interviews automatically after a one-time admin approval. Both are free with existing licenses. Microsoft Teams also integrates through Outlook 365.
Does Greenhouse have an API?
Yes. Greenhouse’s Harvest API lets teams export data, update candidates, and move or reject applications, and v3 replaced v1 and v2 on August 31, 2026. Version 3 uses OAuth 2.0 instead of static API keys. Greenhouse also offers Job Board, Ingestion, Assessment, Audit Log, and Onboarding APIs, plus webhooks.
What does Greenhouse software do?
Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system built for structured hiring: job posts, interview kits, scorecards, scheduling, and offer approvals in one place. More than 7,500 companies use it, according to Greenhouse. It doesn’t source passive candidates on its own, which is why sourcing and screening integrations fill most of its marketplace.
Building Your Greenhouse Stack in Order
The strongest stacks follow the funnel: sourcing first, then scheduling and interviews, then screening, then post-offer sync. Add Greenhouse integrations in that order and each one has clean data to work with. Skip ahead and you’ll automate a pipeline that’s still empty.
For most in-house recruiters, the first slot goes to Pin. It fills Greenhouse with candidates who never applied, and Pin users fill roles in an average of 14 days, per Pin’s 2026 user survey. After that, pick one tool per stage, check that each vendor finished its Harvest v3 migration, and audit duplicates once a quarter.
