Pin vs hireEZ starts with a price gap you can check today: hireEZ’s cheapest published plan is $494 per month for a single recruiter. By contrast, Pin offers a free plan and paid seats from $99 per month billed annually. For most recruiting teams in 2026, Pin is the better AI recruiting platform. Its 850M+ candidate profiles feed sequences that earn 5x the industry-average response rate. At 4.8/5, it’s also the highest-rated AI recruiting software on G2. hireEZ (formerly Hiretual) remains a capable enterprise sourcing suite with a large index. Its buyers pay a $13,000 median annual contract per Vendr, though, and stale contact data was its most common G2 complaint in 2025.
Choosing AI sourcing software is now a mainstream budget decision. According to SHRM’s 2025 Talent Trends report, 43% of HR professionals use AI for HR tasks, up from 26% a year earlier. Meanwhile, LinkedIn’s Future of Recruiting 2025 found that 37% of organizations are integrating or experimenting with generative AI in hiring. So which platform turns that spend into hires faster?
The short version:
- Pin costs less at every published price point. hireEZ’s Solo plan is $494 per month ($5,928 a year), five times Pin Solo at $99 per month billed annually. Five Pin Professional seats run $8,100 a year, below even the low end of Vendr’s hireEZ contract range.
- Pin has a free plan; hireEZ has a 7-day trial. Pin’s free tier needs no credit card and never expires.
- hireEZ claims a bigger index, but reviewers flag its contact data. hireEZ advertises 1B+ profiles. In 2025, G2 reviewers repeatedly called its emails and phone numbers “outdated” or “inaccurate.”
- Both ship AI agents and scheduling. Pin includes two AI agents per Professional user. hireEZ launched EZ Agent in March 2025 and rebuilt its platform in August 2026.
- Pin is the recommended pick for agencies and lean TA teams. Recruiters using Pin fill positions in an average of 14 days, and G2 users rate it 4.8/5 versus 4.6/5 for hireEZ.
Pin vs hireEZ: How Do They Compare at a Glance?
Across the Pin vs hireEZ feature set, Pin wins on price, access, and rating, while hireEZ matches it on agents and scheduling and adds ISO certifications on top of SOC 2. Every hireEZ figure below comes from its pricing and security pages, Vendr, or G2, checked on October 19, 2026. Where a number is a vendor claim rather than third-party data, the cell says so.
| Feature | Pin | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | ✅ Free plan, then $99/mo (Solo, billed annually) | ❌ $494/mo Solo seat |
| Free access | ✅ Free forever, no credit card | ⚠️ 7-day trial |
| Team pricing published | ✅ $135/user/mo annual, $179 monthly | ❌ Quote only |
| Typical team spend | ✅ $8,100/yr for 5 Professional seats | ⚠️ $13,000 median contract, seat count undisclosed (Vendr) |
| Candidate database | ✅ 850M+ profiles, 100% North America and Europe coverage | ✅ 1B+ profiles claimed across 40+ sources |
| Contact data reviews | ✅ Pre-indexed contact data, 1 credit per lookup | ⚠️ Outdated contacts are the top 2025 G2 dislike |
| AI agents | ✅ 2 per Professional user, included | ✅ EZ Agent, platform rebuilt August 2026 |
| Interview scheduling | ✅ Native | ✅ Inside EZ Agent |
| Outreach | ✅ Automated email plus LinkedIn and SMS tasks, 5x response rates | ⚠️ Multi-step outreach, no published response rate |
| ATS integrations | ✅ 120+ | ⚠️ 40+ native; custom connectors cost extra |
| Security | ✅ SOC 2 Type 2 | ✅ SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 |
| G2 rating | ✅ 4.8/5, highest-rated AI recruiting software on G2 | ⚠️ 4.6/5 from 263 ratings |
What Is hireEZ, and What Changed in 2026?
hireEZ, formerly Hiretual, is an AI sourcing and recruiting platform that relaunched in August 2026 as an agent-native product, and its only published price is $494 per month for a Solo seat. Founded in 2015, the company took the hireEZ name in February 2022 alongside a $26M funding round led by Conductive Ventures. Its core workflow searches a public-web candidate index, enriches contacts, runs outreach, and syncs with applicant tracking systems.
Three shifts matter if you last evaluated hireEZ a year ago:
- Agents arrived. EZ Agent, announced in March 2025, is a semi-autonomous layer that handles sourcing through scheduling.
- The platform was rebuilt. hireEZ’s August 2026 press release describes the product as “rebuilt from the ground up.” Because existing customers migrate at their own pace, most public reviews still describe the older version.
- Pricing went partly public. After years of quote-only sales, hireEZ now lists one number: Solo recruiters start at $494 per month with a 7-day trial. Team and enterprise plans stay behind a sales call.
Funding has been modest by enterprise-software standards. Latka counts $45.5M raised across four rounds through 2022, and CB Insights logs a further $8.07M round in February 2025. Want the line-by-line cost math, including credits and setup fees? Our full hireEZ cost breakdown covers it.
What recruiters tell us when they weigh Pin against annual-contract sourcing suites is that database size rarely decides the deal. Simpler questions do. Will the email bounce? Can I try it before procurement gets involved? What happens at renewal?
Those questions shaped how we built Pin. Because contact data is pre-indexed, a lookup costs one credit and a sequence can start the same minute. A free plan exists since recruiters want to test a real search on a real role before anyone signs anything. Pricing is public because many of our customers are solo agency owners who can’t wait three weeks for a quote. Pin’s 2026 user survey across 2,000+ organizations and 20,000+ users shows the payoff. In it, 91% reduced or eliminated their LinkedIn Recruiter spend after switching, and 95% reported better candidate quality than with their previous sourcing method.
Which Platform Has More Reliable Candidate Data?
Pin’s 850M+ profile database covers 100% of North America and Europe, with verified contact data ready at search time. According to its own pricing page, hireEZ claims a larger index of 1B+ profiles across 40+ sources. Yet a raw profile count only matters if the contact details are current, and that’s precisely where hireEZ’s reviewers push back.
G2 rates hireEZ 4.6 out of 5 from 263 ratings, and 97% of those are four or five stars, per G2 reviews syndicated on AWS Marketplace. That’s a well-liked product. When 2025 reviewers listed dislikes, however, data accuracy surfaced again and again:
- A November 2025 reviewer wrote: “The data accuracy isn’t always reliable.” They added that “at times, we receive contact information for a relative instead of the intended person.”
- A July 2025 reviewer said: “Sometimes emails or phone numbers are outdated, which can slow down outreach efforts.”
- Another July 2025 reviewer reported “inaccurate email addresses and phone numbers.”
Each of those three reviewers still rated hireEZ positively overall. Even so, the pattern matters, because a wrong contact costs more than the credit spent on it. Every bounced email chips away at the sender’s domain reputation, and a wrong phone number wastes a recruiter’s morning.
Rather than relying on one source, Pin enriches each profile from professional networks, GitHub, Stack Overflow, patents, and academic publications, which yields thousands of data points per candidate. Contact lookups cost a flat 1 credit per email or phone number. Solo includes 500 credits a month and Professional includes 1,000 per user. By contrast, hireEZ publishes no credit allowance on its pricing page, so buyers can’t calculate cost per contact before signing.
How Do AI Sourcing and Search Accuracy Compare?
Pin reports an 83% candidate acceptance rate, meaning 83% of the people it recommends are accepted into customers’ hiring pipelines, per its 2026 user survey. hireEZ publishes no equivalent accuracy figure. Both platforms accept natural-language searches, and both run AI agents that keep sourcing after a recruiter logs off.
Hard-to-fill roles expose the difference. Pin’s search handles needle-in-a-haystack specialist roles and high-volume hiring from one interface. A recruiter can request 40 warehouse supervisors in Ohio in the morning, then hunt for a staff ML engineer with two shipped recommendation systems after lunch. Rich Moss, Founder and Principal Recruiter at Moss Search, described the result:
“Having tried several other sourcing tools in the past, I can say that Pin stands out as the most effective - it genuinely helps me make placements.”
hireEZ’s agent story is newer. EZ Agent arrived in March 2025, and the August 2026 relaunch rebuilt the platform around agents again. That’s real investment, and hireEZ deserves credit for it. It also means buyers are evaluating a product mid-transition, with few public reviews of the new version. For teams that need predictable sourcing quality this quarter, Pin’s AI recruiting agent is the stronger choice. Two agents per Professional user are included, and each one sources around the clock against the filters a recruiter sets.
Weighing hireEZ against other enterprise suites as well? Our comparison of hireEZ with another enterprise sourcing platform covers index size, clearance filters, and vendor health.
Which Tool Gets More Candidate Replies?
In the Pin vs hireEZ outreach matchup, Pin’s multi-channel sequences deliver 5x better response rates than industry averages. In Pin’s recruiting outreach benchmark, which analyzed 4M+ messages sent through the platform, LinkedIn messages drew a 17.08% reply rate against 4.96% for cold email. That gap explains why channel mix matters more than polishing subject lines.
Inside a Pin sequence, email steps send automatically, while LinkedIn and SMS steps arrive as tasks. AI drafts each LinkedIn message or text, Pin queues it on the scheduled day, and the recruiter sends it. Replies from every channel then land in one shared team inbox, so nobody double-messages a candidate.
hireEZ runs multi-step outreach too, and its CRM tracks engagement across campaigns. It publishes no customer response-rate figure, though. A July 2025 G2 reviewer also noted that “campaign management could be more user-friendly.” Outreach is only as strong as the contact data underneath it, which brings those accuracy complaints back into play.
LinkedIn’s own research supports the multi-channel, AI-assisted approach. According to Future of Recruiting 2025, companies whose recruiters use AI-assisted messaging most are 9% more likely to make a quality hire, and teams using generative AI save about 20% of their work week.
How Does hireEZ Pricing Compare to Pin?
hireEZ’s Solo plan costs $494 per month, or $5,928 a year, per its pricing page checked October 19, 2026. Pin Solo costs $99 per month billed annually, or $1,188 a year, which is one-fifth of hireEZ’s entry price. Above Solo, hireEZ is quote-only, and Vendr’s buyer guide puts its median contract at $13,000 a year, with deals running from about $7,000 to $25,000.
Annual cost by plan, 2026: Pin Solo $1,188; hireEZ Solo $5,928; Pin Professional for five seats $8,100; hireEZ median contract $13,000 (Vendr; seat count not disclosed).
List prices tell only half the story, since contract structure matters as much as the sticker. Because hireEZ quotes every team plan individually, two buyers with identical headcount can pay very different amounts, whereas Pin’s per-seat rate is the same for every customer.
| Plan | Pin | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Free | ✅ $0, no credit card, 3 searches/day | ❌ 7-day trial only |
| Single recruiter | $99/mo (Solo, billed annually) | $494/mo (Solo) |
| Team | $135/user/mo annual or $179 monthly (Professional) | Quote only |
| Enterprise | Business, custom | Custom, median $13,000/yr (Vendr) |
| AI agents | 2 per user included on Professional | Bundled into custom plans |
| Contact credits | 500/mo Solo, 1,000/user/mo Professional | Not published |
Renewal terms deserve a hard look too. Vendr warns that hireEZ renewal pricing “often increases without negotiation,” and its buyer guide notes 5- to 10-seat minimums and annual escalators on larger contracts, so get a written renewal cap before you sign. With Pin’s published pricing, Professional seats can also run month to month, which removes the multi-year lock-in altogether. Quote-based pricing is the norm across enterprise sourcing suites; our look at another enterprise suite’s contract minimums shows a similar pattern at a higher median.
Is hireEZ Worth It in 2026?
hireEZ is worth it for large enterprise TA teams that already run it, have negotiated a renewal cap, and need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 certification on their vendor checklist. For almost everyone else, the math is hard to justify. A solo agency recruiter pays five times Pin’s entry price for hireEZ, and Vendr’s median hireEZ contract of $13,000 sits well above the $8,100 a five-seat Pin Professional team pays.
Here’s a fair summary of what hireEZ’s public reviews say:
- Strengths. Reviewers praise fast sourcing, a useful Chrome extension, and responsive support; Capterra users rate support 4.8 out of 5.
- Data accuracy. Outdated emails, wrong numbers, and contacts for the wrong person were the most common 2025 dislikes on G2.
- Usability. A July 2025 G2 reviewer wanted campaign management to be “more user-friendly.”
- Price. At $494 per month, the cheapest published seat costs more than Pin’s per-user Professional rate on either billing option.
- Review age. Many Capterra reviews date from the Hiretual era, so they describe an older product.
One more diligence point: hireEZ’s security page links a GDPR validation letter addressed to “HireTeamMate, Inc.”, not hireEZ. There may be a simple corporate explanation, but ask the sales team before your legal review does.
LinkedIn Recruiter is the other benchmark most teams weigh here. Our breakdown of hireEZ compared with LinkedIn Recruiter covers that matchup, and for the Pin side, see Pin against LinkedIn Recruiter seat for seat.
Which Platform Fits Agencies, In-House Teams, and Enterprises?
Pin is the best AI recruiting platform for staffing agencies and lean in-house teams, because it combines published pricing, multi-client support, and a 14-day average time-to-fill. Agencies feel the price gap most, since every dollar spent on software comes straight out of placement margin.
Nick Poloni, President at Cascadia Search Group, described what that looks like for a one-person desk: “I jumped into Pin solo toward the end of 2025 and closed out the year with over $1M in billings during just the final 4 months - no team, no agency.”
| Team type | Better fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Solo agency recruiter | Pin | $99/mo vs $494/mo, free plan to start |
| Growing agency (3-10 recruiters) | Pin | Per-seat pricing, multi-client support, shared inbox |
| In-house startup TA team | Pin | Month-to-month on Professional, native scheduling, 120+ ATS integrations |
| Enterprise TA on hireEZ already | Pin for new seats, then reassess at renewal | Avoid paying twice; pilot Pin before the renewal window |
| Enterprise with ISO 27701 on its checklist | Run a security review on both | Pin is SOC 2 Type 2; hireEZ lists ISO 27701 on its security page |
Labor-market data argues for choosing carefully. The BLS counts 939,700 HR specialist jobs, including recruiters, in 2025 and projects 6% growth through 2035 (BLS, 2026). With recruiter headcount growing slowly, whichever tool each recruiter uses carries more of the load.
How We Compared Pin and hireEZ
We compared both platforms on six criteria that recruiting buyers use:
- Price and access. Published pricing, free plan or trial, and contract terms.
- Candidate data. Index size, sources, and contact accuracy as reviewers report it.
- Sourcing and AI agents. Search approach, agent features, and release history.
- Outreach. Channels, sequence tools, and published response rates.
- Integrations and security. ATS connectors and certifications.
- User ratings. G2 and Capterra scores, review counts, and recurring dislikes.
In October 2026 we reviewed hireEZ’s pricing page and its security and compliance page, pulled Vendr’s hireEZ marketplace data and buyer guide, and checked funding records on Latka and CB Insights. Because G2 blocked direct access, we read hireEZ’s G2 reviews through the AWS Marketplace feed. We also read hireEZ’s 2025 and 2026 product announcements. hireEZ publishes a price for its Solo plan only, so team pricing here relies on Vendr’s third-party buyer data, which doesn’t disclose seat counts. Ratings are a snapshot from October 19, 2026 and will move as new reviews come in.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best hireEZ alternative in 2026?
Pin is the best hireEZ alternative for most recruiting teams in 2026. It offers a free plan, paid seats from $99 per month billed annually, and 850M+ candidate profiles. By comparison, hireEZ’s Solo plan starts at $494 per month, and its median contract runs $13,000 a year per Vendr.
How much does hireEZ cost?
hireEZ’s Solo plan costs $494 per month, or $5,928 a year, with a 7-day free trial. Team and enterprise plans are quote-only. Vendr’s buyer data puts the median hireEZ contract at $13,000 a year, with most deals between about $7,000 and $25,000.
Is hireEZ the same as Hiretual?
Yes. Hiretual renamed itself hireEZ in February 2022, alongside a $26 million funding round led by Conductive Ventures. The company was founded in 2015, and older reviews on Capterra still list the product under the Hiretual name.
Is hireEZ worth it for small recruiting teams?
For most small teams, no. hireEZ’s cheapest published seat costs $494 per month, about five times Pin’s $99 Solo plan. G2 reviewers in 2025 also flagged outdated contact data, which adds hidden cost through bounced emails.
Does hireEZ have a free plan?
No. hireEZ offers a 7-day free trial on its Solo plan, then charges $494 per month. Pin offers a free-forever plan with no credit card, including 3 searches per day and 5 contact lookups per week.
hireEZ vs Pin: Which Should You Choose in 2026?
The hireEZ vs Pin decision comes down to team size and what you’ve already signed. hireEZ is a mature, well-reviewed sourcing suite with a large index, new agent features, and strong security certifications. It also costs $494 a month for one recruiter, keeps team pricing behind a sales call, and draws repeated reviewer complaints about stale contact data.
Pin delivers the same core workflow, from sourcing through outreach to scheduling, at one-fifth of hireEZ’s entry price. Recruiters using it save 12 hours a week on sourcing and outreach, and G2 users rate it 4.8/5. If your team runs hireEZ today, settle the Pin vs hireEZ question with a short pilot before the renewal notice arrives:
- Open a free Pin account and pick one live role that hireEZ already covers.
- Run the same search on both platforms and compare how many contacts verify.
- Send one sequence from each and track replies for two weeks.
- Bring the cost and reply data to your renewal conversation.
